Mortgage Payoff vs. Investment: NZ 2025

Strategic Capital Allocation in the 2025 New Zealand Economy: A Comparative Analysis of Mortgage Deleveraging Versus Asset Accumulation

The financial landscape of New Zealand in 2025 presents a highly complex matrix of variables for households and investors, characterized by a decisive pivot in monetary policy, evolving tax structures, and a shifting macroeconomic outlook. The perennial debate—whether to accelerate mortgage repayment or allocate surplus capital toward investment vehicles—has been fundamentally altered by the specific economic conditions prevailing in the mid-2020s. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of this trade-off, moving beyond simplistic rules of thumb to incorporate advanced tax arbitrage strategies, behavioral finance findings, and granular economic forecasts.

As of mid-2025, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) has transitioned from a restrictive stance to an easing cycle, bringing the Official Cash Rate (OCR) down to 3.25% from a peak of 5.5%, with forecasts suggesting a terminal rate between 2.25% and 3.0% by 2026.¹ This reduction in the cost of borrowing lowers the “hurdle rate” for investment returns, yet the simultaneous compression of term deposit yields and the persistence of global market volatility introduces new risks. The era of the “guaranteed” 7% return from mortgage repayment has ended, replaced by a lower, albeit still risk-free, benchmark of approximately 4.9%.¹

Furthermore, the fiscal environment has shifted significantly with the implementation of the 39% trustee tax rate, creating a profound arbitrage opportunity through Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs), which remain capped at 28%.³ This report argues that while the psychological benefits of debt elimination remain potent—supported by evidence linking debt relief to improved cognitive function ⁵—the mathematical case for investing is increasingly robust for high-income earners utilizing tax-efficient structures, provided they can tolerate the liquidity constraints and market volatility.

This analysis exhaustively examines the mathematical, tax, and behavioral dimensions of this decision, incorporating interest rate forecasts, housing market projections, and investment performance data to provide a comprehensive framework for capital allocation in 2025. It delves into the nuances of the “bandwidth tax” imposed by debt, the specific mechanics of Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) taxation within PIE structures, and the implications of new Debt-to-Income (DTI) restrictions on property investors.

1. The Macroeconomic Environment of 2025

To evaluate the trade-off between debt repayment and investing, one must first establish the economic baseline. The cost of debt and the expected return on assets are both downstream effects of broader macroeconomic currents. The year 2025 marks a distinct turning point, a “transition year” where the aggressive tightening of the early 2020s gives way to a search for a neutral policy setting.

1.1 Monetary Policy and Interest Rate Trajectory

By July 2025, the New Zealand economy had moved firmly past the inflationary shocks of the early 2020s. The RBNZ’s monetary policy committee, having successfully corralled inflation back toward the 2% midpoint, initiated a series of OCR cuts. This shift was not merely a reaction to falling inflation but a necessary response to significant economic headwinds.

The State of the OCR

As of July 2025, the OCR stands at 3.25%, marking a significant reduction from the restrictive 5.5% peak.¹ The central bank’s actions have been driven by a need to stimulate economic activity following a period of weakness characterized by a 0.7% GDP contraction in Q1 2025 and rising unemployment.¹ The RBNZ’s commentary highlights that “economic activity through the middle of 2025 was weak,” necessitating lower interest rates to encourage household spending and business investment.⁶

Forecasting consensus indicates that the easing cycle is nearing its conclusion but has not yet hit the absolute floor. The divergence in bank forecasts provides a range of potential outcomes that investors must consider.

Aggressive Forecasts: Institutions such as ANZ and Kiwibank predict the OCR could fall further to 2.5%.¹ Kiwibank’s economics team is particularly dovish, expecting the cash rate to fall below 3% by the end of 2025, driven by the need to “entice investors back” into the housing market.⁷
Conservative Forecasts: ASB and Westpac anticipate a bottoming out at roughly 3.0%.¹ They emphasize the risk of “sticky” non-tradable inflation preventing a return to the ultra-low rates of the pandemic era.
Market Pricing: Financial markets are pricing in a high probability of a terminal rate near 2.25% by 2026, reflecting concerns over persistent spare capacity in the economy.² The RBNZ itself has signaled that while the OCR is currently 3.25%, the risks to domestic inflationary pressure remain balanced to the downside, supporting the case for further easing.⁸

Mortgage Rate Transmission

These policy decisions have transmitted directly to retail mortgage rates, albeit with a lag and some margin compression by banks. The era of 7%+ fixed rates has definitively ended. As of mid-2025, the lowest advertised rates have broken below the psychological 5% barrier.

1-Year Fixed: Available from roughly 4.89%.¹ This rate is critical as it serves as the short-term benchmark for the “risk-free” return of debt repayment.
2-Year Fixed: Hovering around 4.95%.¹ The flatness of the curve between 1 and 2 years suggests markets expect rates to remain relatively stable in the medium term.
Floating Rates: Remain elevated at 6.35% – 6.95%, creating a steep penalty for borrowers requiring flexibility.¹ The wide spread between fixed and floating rates (nearly 200 basis points) continues to drive borrowers toward shorter-term fixed contracts.

This data suggests that the “guaranteed return” from paying off a mortgage—which is equivalent to the interest rate avoided—has compressed significantly. In 2023-2024, paying off a mortgage offered a risk-free, tax-free return of nearly 7.5%. In 2025, that risk-free return has dropped to approximately 4.9%. This 260 basis point shift fundamentally alters the opportunity cost calculation, making alternative investments comparatively more attractive, assuming their expected returns have not compressed to the same degree.

Table 1: Detailed Mortgage Rate Forecasts by Bank (2025-2027)

Forecast Period	Floating Rate	1-Year Fixed	2-Year Fixed	3-Year Fixed	Source
Dec 2025	5.8%	4.6%	4.7%	4.9%	⁹
June 2026	5.8%	4.8%	4.8%	5.0%	⁹
Sept 2026	5.8%	4.9%	4.9%	5.0%	⁹
Mar 2027	6.0%	5.1%	5.1%	5.1%	⁹

Note: These forecasts from Canstar indicate a bottoming of fixed rates in late 2025 followed by a gradual normalization upward in 2026 and 2027. This suggests that the window to lock in sub-5% rates may be relatively short, reinforcing the need for timely decision-making.

1.2 Inflation and Real Returns

The decision to hold debt is also a decision to short the currency. In high-inflation environments, the real value of debt erodes, benefiting the borrower. However, 2025 is characterized by disinflation, which changes the dynamic entirely.

Annual inflation is expected to converge to roughly 2.8% by late 2025, moving toward the 2% midpoint in the first half of 2026.⁸ This follows a period where annual food prices rose 4.7% in the year to October 2025, driven by a 4.9% rise in grocery prices and a significant 7.69% increase in meat, poultry, and fish.¹⁰ While headline inflation is falling, these specific component increases remind us that the cost of living remains a pressure point for households, potentially reducing the surplus income available for either debt repayment or investing.

Nominal vs. Real Rates: With mortgage rates at ~4.9% and inflation at ~2.8%, the real interest rate (the cost of borrowing adjusted for inflation) is approximately 2.1%.
Implication: Borrowers can no longer rely on high inflation to erode the real value of their principal. The cost of servicing debt is real and tangible. In 2022, with inflation at 7% and mortgage rates at 5%, real rates were negative, heavily subsidizing borrowers. In 2025, the positive real rate increases the incentive to deleverage unless investment returns can significantly outpace the 4.9% nominal hurdle.

1.3 The Housing Market Outlook

For many New Zealanders, the “invest” side of the equation often means “invest in more property.” The 2025 housing market is described as awakening from a “comatose” state, but the recovery is uneven and fraught with policy-driven nuances.¹¹

Forecasts from major lenders suggest a stabilization in 2025 followed by appreciation in 2026.

Westpac: Predicts relatively flat prices in 2025 (0.6% to 1% growth) but forecasts a 5.4% lift in 2026 as the cumulative effect of lower interest rates stimulates demand.¹² They attribute the sluggish 2025 start to a “stock of unrequited supply” accumulated during the downturn, which is now flooding the market.¹⁴
ANZ: Similarly downgraded 2025 growth to 2.5% but expects a 5.0% increase in 2026.¹⁵ They note that sales volumes have stabilized around their long-run average, but “rising demand has been met with an ample supply of new listings,” keeping a lid on prices.
Kiwibank: Expects steady gains driven by falling interest rates, noting that “interest rates are the largest driver of house prices”.⁷ They also highlight the potential impact of investors returning to the market following changes to the Brightline test and interest deductibility rules.

This anticipated capital appreciation (roughly 5% in 2026) complicates the “pay off debt” decision. If a homeowner uses surplus cash to reduce their mortgage, they secure a 4.9% return. If they use that cash to leverage into an investment property (assuming 20% equity), the return on equity (ROE) could be significantly higher due to leverage, if the 5% capital gains forecast materializes. However, the reintroduction of interest deductibility and the easing of Loan-to-Value (LVR) restrictions are counterbalanced by the new Debt-to-Income (DTI) rules, which came into effect on July 1, 2024. These rules may cap the borrowing capacity of investors regardless of their equity position, potentially dampening the “investor frenzy” seen in previous cycles.⁷

2. The Mathematics of the Trade-off

The core of the decision is a mathematical inequality: Is the after-tax return on investment greater than the after-tax cost of debt? In New Zealand, this calculation is unique due to the absence of a comprehensive capital gains tax and the specific treatment of mortgage interest (which is generally not tax-deductible for the family home).

2.1 The Guaranteed Return of Deleveraging

Paying down a mortgage offers a return equal to the interest rate on the loan. This return is:

Risk-Free: There is zero variance in the outcome. The savings are contractual.
Tax-Free: In New Zealand, interest savings on a personal owner-occupied mortgage are not subject to income tax.

The Calculation:

If a borrower has a mortgage fixed at 4.95% 1, every $10,000 lump sum payment saves $495 in interest in the first year.

To achieve a comparable net return through a taxable investment (like a term deposit or savings account), the gross return must be significantly higher. This is because interest income is taxed at the individual’s marginal rate.

Table 2: The Pre-Tax Investment Yield Required to Beat a 4.95% Mortgage Repayment

Borrower’s Marginal Tax Rate	Mortgage Rate (Net Return)	Required Gross Investment Return (Break-Even)
10.5%	4.95%	5.53%
17.5%	4.95%	6.00%
30.0%	4.95%	7.07%
33.0%	4.95%	7.39%
39.0%	4.95%	8.11%

Source: Derived from NZ Tax Rates and Mortgage Data ¹

Insight: For a high-income earner (39% tax bracket), paying off a mortgage at 4.95% is mathematically equivalent to finding a risk-free investment yielding 8.11%. In the 2025 environment, where term deposits have fallen to below 4.0% ¹⁶, no risk-free asset comes close to this return. Therefore, risk-free assets (cash, bonds) are mathematically inferior to debt repayment for high-income earners. The comparison must be made against risk assets (equities).

2.2 The Return Profile of Equities

To justify not paying off the mortgage, an investor must believe their portfolio will outperform the 8.11% hurdle rate (for top-rate taxpayers) or 7.07% (for 30% taxpayers).

Market Performance and Forecasts

NZX50: The New Zealand share market has shown resilience. As of late 2025, the S&P/NZX 50 Index was trading near all-time highs of roughly 13,570, having broken its 2021 peak in October 2025.¹⁷ The index has historically delivered gross returns of roughly 8.21% per year over the decade ending June 2025.¹⁸ This suggests that the local market, on average, just clears the 8.11% hurdle for top-rate taxpayers, but with significant volatility.
Global Equities: Markets such as the S&P 500 have historically delivered higher returns, often averaging 10-12% nominal. In 2024, the S&P 500 returned 25%, highlighting the potential upside of global exposure.¹⁹ However, these returns are subject to currency fluctuations and global macroeconomic risks.
KiwiSaver Performance: Growth funds in KiwiSaver schemes have averaged returns of 11.6% over the 12 months to September 2025.²⁰ Top performers like the Milford Active Growth Fund have delivered 10% annualized over 10 years.²⁰ Other funds like the Generate Focused Growth Fund delivered 15.0% in the past year.²⁰ These figures strongly suggest that a diversified growth portfolio can outperform mortgage interest rates over the medium to long term.

The Comparison:

Mortgage Payoff: ~4.95% (Risk-Free, Tax-Free).
NZ Equities (Gross): ~8.2% (Volatile, Taxable).
Global Equities (Gross): ~10-12% (Volatile, Taxable).

On a raw numbers basis, a diversified growth portfolio (10-12%) historically outperforms the current cost of debt (4.95%), even after adjusting for tax (discussed in Section 3). However, the risk premium—the extra return received for taking on the volatility of the stock market—must be considered. If the equity risk premium is historically 3-5% over the risk-free rate, investing should beat mortgage repayment over the long term, but with significant sequence-of-returns risk. This is particularly relevant given recent market jitters; for instance, the NZX50 dropped 1.16% in a single day in November 2025 following weakness on Wall Street ²¹, reminding investors that volatility is the price of admission for higher returns.

3. Structural Alpha: The Tax Efficiency Paradigm in 2025

Gemini Generated Image 8rz2yt8rz2yt8rz2 1024x559

The most critical development in the 2025 New Zealand financial landscape is the divergence of tax rates. The government’s decision to increase the trustee tax rate to 39% (matching the top personal rate) while leaving the Portfolio Investment Entity (PIE) cap at 28% has created a structural anomaly that favors investing via specific vehicles over debt repayment for certain demographics. This “structural alpha”—return generated purely through tax efficiency rather than asset performance—is a key lever for wealth generation in 2025.

3.1 The PIE vs. Personal Tax Arbitrage

For individuals earning over $53,501 (30% rate), $78,100 (33% rate), or $180,000 (39% rate), the tax system penalizes direct income (e.g., from a savings account or direct share dividends) more heavily than income channeled through a PIE.

The Mechanism:

Personal Income Tax: Marginal rates up to 39%.
Trust Tax: Flat rate of 39% from April 1, 2024.³
PIE Tax (PIR): Capped at a maximum of 28%.⁴

The Arbitrage Effect:

An investor in the 39% tax bracket (or a Trust) who invests in a PIE fund receives an effective 11% tax subsidy relative to their marginal rate.

Scenario A (Direct Invest): Investor earns $1,000 in dividends. Tax = $390. Net = $610.
Scenario B (PIE Fund): Investor earns $1,000 in a PIE. Tax = $280. Net = $720.

This increases the effective net return of the investment.

Revisiting the “Break-Even” calculation from Table 2:

If investing through a PIE, the tax drag is only 28%.

Mortgage Cost: 4.95%.
Required PIE Return to Break Even: $4.95 / (1 – 0.28) = 6.875%.

Strategic Implication:

For a top-rate taxpayer, the hurdle rate to beat the mortgage drops from 8.11% (if investing directly) to 6.88% (if investing in a PIE). Given that conservative growth funds and even some aggressive balanced funds target returns well above 7%, the PIE structure significantly tilts the math in favor of investing.4 This arbitrage is particularly potent for Trusts, which now face a 39% tax rate on retained earnings but can access the 28% rate via PIEs, effectively saving 11 cents on every dollar of investment income.3

3.2 Term PIEs vs. Debt Repayment

Even for risk-averse investors who prefer cash, “Term PIEs” offer an advantage.

As of late 2025, PIE Term Deposit rates for 12 months are approximately 3.40% – 3.50%.4

For a 39% taxpayer, a 3.50% PIE rate is equivalent to a 5.73% standard term deposit rate.
While this 5.73% equivalent return is higher than standard bank offers, it is arguably still lower than the ~6.5-7.0% floating mortgage rate, and only slightly higher than the ~4.9% fixed mortgage rate.
Conclusion: Cash investments (even PIEs) struggle to compete with mortgage repayment purely on yield. The arbitrage works best when applied to higher-yielding assets like equities managed within a PIE structure. However, for funds that must be kept in cash (e.g., an emergency fund), a Term PIE is vastly superior to a standard savings account for high-income earners.

3.3 Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) Rules and PIEs

For global investments, the tax distinction becomes even sharper. New Zealand residents are generally taxed on 5% of the opening market value of their offshore shares (Fair Dividend Rate method) at their marginal tax rate.

Personal/Trust (39%): Tax is 39% of 5% = 1.95% of the portfolio value annually, regardless of returns.
PIE Fund (28%): Tax is 28% of 5% = 1.40% of the portfolio value annually.

This 0.55% difference in annual fees/tax drag is substantial over a 10-20 year compounding period. It effectively acts as a fee reduction, further incentivizing the use of NZ-domiciled PIE funds that hold global assets (e.g., Kernel, Simplicity, Milford) over direct brokerage ownership of US stocks for large portfolios.⁴ For an investor with a $100,000 portfolio, this saves $550 per year in tax—compounded over 20 years at 7%, this difference grows to nearly $24,000.

4. Behavioral Finance: The Psychology of Deleveraging

While the spreadsheet may favor investing in a PIE fund (targeting 10% returns with a 6.88% hurdle rate), human behavior is not governed solely by spreadsheeting. Behavioral finance literature suggests that debt carries a “cognitive load” that financial models often fail to capture. The decision involves not just maximizing net worth, but maximizing well-being.

4.1 The Bandwidth Tax and Cognitive Function

Research indicates that chronic debt imposes a “bandwidth tax” on the human mind. A pivotal study on debt relief ⁵ demonstrated that eliminating debt accounts significantly improves cognitive functioning and decision-making.

Cognitive Improvement: Clearing debt was found to improve cognitive functioning by approximately 0.25 standard deviations. This is a non-trivial improvement, comparable to the difference between a good night’s sleep and significant sleep deprivation.
Anxiety Reduction: Debt relief reduced the likelihood of anxiety by 11%. The study found that the number of debt accounts mattered more than the total dollar amount—clearing one specific debt account was more psychologically freeing than partially paying down several.
Present Bias: Those with less debt were less likely to exhibit “present bias” (the tendency to make impulsive, short-term decisions at the expense of long-term well-being).

This finding implies that the Return on Investment (ROI) of paying off a mortgage includes a non-financial component: enhanced career performance and decision-making ability. If the psychological relief of being mortgage-free allows an individual to focus better at work, secure a promotion, or take a calculated entrepreneurial risk, the financial payoff could far exceed the 2-3% arbitrage gained from the stock market. For high-performing professionals, the “peace of mind” dividend is a tangible asset.

4.2 Mental Accounting and Liquidity Preference

Investors often engage in “mental accounting,” treating mortgage debt and investment portfolios as separate buckets, ignoring the fungibility of money.⁵

The “Sleep at Night” Factor: For risk-averse individuals, the volatility of the stock market (e.g., a 20% drop in one year ²³) induces stress that outweighs the potential gains. The certainty of a mortgage payment reduction is psychologically valuable. During market downturns, investors who prioritized debt repayment often feel a sense of security that prevents panic selling, whereas leveraged investors may feel compelled to liquidate assets at the bottom.
Liquidity Trap: However, paying off a mortgage reduces liquidity. Once money is put into the house, it is difficult to extract without refinancing (which may be subject to strict credit criteria or DTI rules). An investment portfolio provides liquidity—shares can be sold in days. In 2025, with economic uncertainty still present, maintaining a “liquidity buffer” in an offset account or managed fund may be safer than aggressively paying down debt to zero, leaving the household cash-poor.²⁴ An offset mortgage is often the ideal compromise, offering the interest savings of repayment while retaining the liquidity of cash.

5. Investment Vehicles and Performance Analysis

For those who choose to invest surplus income, the vehicle selection is paramount to maximizing the spread over the mortgage rate. The New Zealand market in 2025 offers a diverse array of funds, with distinct performance characteristics.

5.1 KiwiSaver: The First Tranche of Investment

KiwiSaver remains the most efficient investment vehicle due to the employer match and government contribution.

Return: A 3% contribution matched by an employer offers an immediate 100% return (pre-tax). No mortgage repayment can compete with this.
2025 Performance: Growth funds have performed robustly. The Milford KiwiSaver Active Growth Fund, for example, returned 12.7% in the year to September 2025 and 10% annualized over a decade.²⁰ The ASB KiwiSaver Growth Fund returned 14.6% in the same period.²⁰
Strategy: Before paying extra on a mortgage, investors should ensure they are contributing at least enough to capture the full employer match and the government tax credit. This is the “free lunch” of the NZ system. Increasing contributions beyond the match (e.g., to 8% or 10%) should be weighed against the mortgage rate, as those extra funds are locked in until age 65.

5.2 Managed Funds vs. ETFs

The debate between active management (e.g., Milford) and passive indexing (e.g., Simplicity, Kernel) continues in 2025.

Cost Sensitivity: Passive funds like Kernel and Simplicity offer fees as low as 0.10% – 0.25%.⁴ In a lower-return environment, fee minimization is crucial. A 1% fee differential requires 20% more risk to recoup. Simplicity’s growth funds have gained popularity for their low-cost structure, which is a significant advantage over long compounding periods.
Performance: Active managers argue that in volatile markets (like the post-inflationary stabilization of 2025), they can protect downside. Data shows mixed results, with some active funds outperforming the index significantly (Milford’s 10% vs average growth funds ~8%) ²⁰, while broad indexes like the S&P 500 have been hard to beat.¹⁹ The Generate Focused Growth Fund, an active fund, delivered a standout 15.0% return in the year to September 2025 ²⁰, demonstrating that alpha generation is possible, though not guaranteed.
Recommendation: For the “Invest” strategy to work, the portfolio must be aggressive (Growth or High Growth). Investing in a “Conservative” fund yielding 5-6% makes no sense when the mortgage cost is ~5% and the tax drag is considered.

5.3 Cash Back Incentives and Switching Costs

A relatively new dynamic in 2025 is the aggressive use of cash back incentives by banks to attract refinancing customers. ANZ, for instance, offered a 1.5% cash back incentive up to $30,000 in late 2025, a move described as “incredibly aggressive”.²⁵

The Math of Switching: If a borrower with a $500,000 mortgage switches banks to capture a 1% cash back ($5,000), they effectively reduce their first-year interest cost. If the switch allows them to access a lower fixed rate (e.g., 4.89% vs 5.15%), the savings are compounded.
Strategic Deleveraging: Smart borrowers are using these cash back lump sums to immediately pay down principal, effectively using the bank’s marketing budget to deleverage. This strategy can be combined with either debt repayment or investing, acting as a one-off capital injection.

6. Scenario Analysis: Modeling the Decision in 2025

To synthesize the data, we apply these variables to three distinct investor profiles common in New Zealand.

Scenario A: The Young Professional (High Income, High Risk Tolerance)

Profile: Age 30, Income $150k (33% tax), Mortgage $600k at 4.95%.
Option 1 (Pay Debt): Guaranteed 4.95% return.
Option 2 (Invest): Aggressive PIE Fund (Global Equities). Target return 10%. Net return after 28% PIR = 7.2%.
Outcome: Investing yields a 2.25% spread (7.2% – 4.95%).
Context: With a long time horizon (30+ years), this investor can ride out volatility. The compounding effect of the spread is massive. The “Invest” strategy is mathematically superior.
Westpac Calculation: Using Westpac’s repayment data, increasing monthly payments from $4,497 to $4,800 on a $750k loan saves $150,000 in interest over the life of the loan.²⁶ However, investing that same monthly difference ($303) at 7.2% over 30 years would grow to approximately $370,000. The investment strategy generates over double the wealth surplus.

Scenario B: The Mid-Career Family (Trust Structure, 39% Tax)

Profile: Family Trust, Household Income $250k+, Mortgage $400k.
Tax Situation: Trust tax rate is 39%. PIE cap is 28%.
The Arbitrage: If they pay down debt, they save 4.95% interest. If they invest via the Trust into a PIE, they gain access to the 28% tax rate.
Outcome: The tax arbitrage strongly incentives using the PIE structure. Paying down debt with 39% taxed income is expensive compared to generating wealth in a 28% taxed vehicle.
Caveat: DTI rules may limit their ability to buy more property, so equities (PIEs) become the primary growth engine. The Trust can invest in a PIE fund holding international shares, paying only 1.4% tax on the portfolio value (FIF rules within PIE), versus nearly 2% if held directly.

Scenario C: The Pre-Retiree (Risk Averse, Short Horizon)

Profile: Age 60, Mortgage $100k, Retirement in 5 years.
Constraint: Sequence of returns risk. If the market drops 20% in 2026, their retirement plans are ruined.
Outcome: Pay off the mortgage. The “return” of debt freedom is not just the 4.95% interest saved, but the reduction of fixed expenses in retirement. A mortgage-free home creates a baseline of security that allows for riskier asset allocation with the remaining portfolio later. The short time horizon makes the stock market too risky compared to the certainty of debt elimination.²⁷ The bandwidth tax is also higher for this demographic; eliminating the mortgage simplifies their financial life as they approach the decumulation phase.

7. The Risks: What Could Go Wrong?

While the baseline forecast for 2025 suggests a “Goldilocks” scenario of falling rates and rising asset prices, risks remain.

7.1 Interest Rate Reversal

Forecasts are probabilistic, not deterministic. If inflation reignites (e.g., due to geopolitical supply shocks or tradable inflation ⁸), the RBNZ may be forced to halt cuts or hike rates.

Risk: An investor who chose not to pay off their mortgage and kept a floating rate of 6.5% while markets crash would face a “double whammy”—rising debt costs and falling asset values.
Mitigation: Fix the mortgage for 2-3 years to lock in the ~4.9% cost while investing.¹ This insulates the liability side of the balance sheet while allowing the asset side to grow.

7.2 Sequence of Returns Risk

Comparing a steady mortgage repayment to a volatile stock market return is dangerous over short timeframes.

Data: The NZX50 fell 1.16% in a single day in November 2025.²¹ If an investor needs liquidity during a downturn, they crystallize losses.
Insight: The “Invest” strategy requires a minimum timeframe of 7-10 years to smooth out volatility and ensure the average return exceeds the cost of debt.

7.3 Policy Risk

The 39% Trust tax / 28% PIE cap discrepancy is a glaring policy inconsistency. It is plausible that future governments could align the PIE rate with the personal/trust rate to close this loophole.

Impact: If the PIE rate rises to 39%, the “Break-Even” hurdle for a top-rate taxpayer jumps from 6.88% to 8.11%. This would instantly make debt repayment more attractive relative to investing. Investors should monitor tax policy closely, as this arbitrage may be transitional.

8. Conclusion and Strategic Framework

In 2025, the binary choice of “pay mortgage vs. invest” has evolved into a nuanced optimization problem involving tax structures, interest rate forecasting, and psychological profiling.

The Verdict:

For the Majority (The “Peace of Mind” Approach): With mortgage rates at ~5% and term deposit rates dropping below 4%, paying off the mortgage remains the most prudent “defensive” investment. It guarantees a 5% tax-free return, improves cognitive bandwidth ⁵, and insulates the household from future interest rate shocks. It is the superior choice for risk-averse individuals and those nearing retirement.
For the Sophisticated/High-Income Investor (The “Arbitrage” Approach): The combination of the 39% trustee tax rate and the 28% PIE cap creates a compelling case for investing, provided:

The investment is structured through a PIE fund (KiwiSaver or Managed Fund).
The investment allocation is Growth or High Growth (targeting 8%+).
The investor has a time horizon of 10+ years.
The investor has sufficient liquidity elsewhere to avoid selling assets during a downturn.

Actionable Framework for 2025:

Step 1: Maximize KiwiSaver. Ensure you are getting the full employer match. This beats all other options.
Step 2: Clear High-Interest Debt. Credit cards and personal loans (15%+) must go first.²⁸
Step 3: Evaluate the Hurdle. Calculate your break-even rate based on your tax bracket (see Table 2).
Step 4: The PIE Pivot. If you are in the 33% or 39% bracket, prioritize PIE investments over direct share ownership to lower your hurdle rate.
Step 5: Hybrid Approach. Consider a “split” strategy. Fix the mortgage at ~4.9% to secure certainty, and allocate 50% of surplus cash to the mortgage and 50% to a high-growth PIE fund. This hedges the risk of rate rises while capturing the upside of the equity market and the tax arbitrage.²⁹
Step 6: Leverage Cash Backs. If refinancing, actively shop for cash back offers (targeting 1%+) and apply the lump sum directly to the principal to create an immediate deleveraging event.²⁵

Ultimately, the 2025 environment rewards those who can navigate the tax system efficiently. The “free money” era of 2% mortgages is over, but the “smart money” era of tax-efficient structural investing has begun.

Statistical Appendix: Key Data Points for 2025

Table 3: Interest Rate & Market Forecast Summary

Metric	Current/Forecast Value (2025)	Trend	Source
Official Cash Rate (OCR)	3.25% (July 2025)	Falling to ~2.25-3.0%	¹
1-Year Fixed Mortgage	~4.89%	Stabilizing/Slight Fall	¹
Floating Mortgage Rate	~6.35% – 6.95%	Stable High	¹
Inflation (CPI)	~2.8%	Converging to 2%	¹⁰
Term Deposit (1 Year)	~3.40% – 3.96%	Falling	⁴
House Price Growth (2026)	+5.4% (Forecast)	Rising	¹¹
NZX50 10-Year Return	~8.21% p.a.	Volatile	¹⁸
Top PIE Tax Rate	28%	Capped	⁴
Trust Tax Rate	39%	Increased	³

References & Further Reading

Tax Efficiency: MoneyHub Guide on PIE vs. PIR.⁴
Behavioral Finance: Study on Psychological Cost of Debt (Ong et al.).⁵
Housing Forecasts: Westpac and ANZ Economic Bulletins.¹²
Fund Performance: Canstar KiwiSaver Reports.²⁰

Works cited

Interest Rate Forecast 2025: When Will Mortgage Interest Rates Hit …, accessed November 23, 2025, https://mortgagemasters.co.nz/interest-rate-forecast-2025-when-will-mortgage-interest-rates-hit-bottom-and-what-it-means-for-you
Final OCR cut expected, door left open for more, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.mpamag.com/nz/news/general/final-ocr-cut-expected-door-left-open-for-more/557242
New focus on PIE structures following trustee tax rate increase – Bell Gully, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.bellgully.com/insights/new-focus-on-pie-structures-following-trustee-tax-rate-increase/
Tax Efficient Investing – MoneyHub NZ, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.moneyhub.co.nz/tax-efficient-investing.html
Reducing debt improves psychological functioning and changes …, accessed November 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6462060/
The official cash rate (OCR) – Reserve Bank of New Zealand – Te Pūtea Matua, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/monetary-policy/about-monetary-policy/the-official-cash-rate
Our housing market forecast | Home loans – Kiwibank, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.kiwibank.co.nz/personal-banking/home-loans/guides/housing-market-forecast/
OCR reduced to 2.5% – Reserve Bank of New Zealand – Te Pūtea Matua, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/hub/news/2025/10/ocr-reduced-to-2-5-percent
How Low Will Mortgage Rates Go in 2025? – Canstar, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.canstar.co.nz/home-loans/when-will-interest-rates-go-down/
‘No obstacles’: Economists forecast OCR to be cut and inflation to drop, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.interest.co.nz/economy/136192/statistics-nz%E2%80%99s-selected-price-indexes-shows-annual-food-prices-47-october-year-due
House prices forecast to rise 5.4% in 2026 as ‘comatose’ market awakens – economist, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/business/house-prices-to-lift-54-in-2026-as-comatose-market-awakens-westpac-chief-economist/
New Zealand housing market update September 2025 | Westpac IQ, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.westpaciq.com.au/economics/2025/09/new-zealand-housing-market-update-september-2025
More buyers with low deposits getting into housing market – Good Returns, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.goodreturns.co.nz/article/976524863/more-buyers-with-low-deposits-getting-into-housing-market.html
Housing market update. | Westpac – ECONOMIC BULLETIN, accessed November 23, 2025, https://assets.dam.westpac.co.nz/is/content/wnzl/dist/all-of-bank/economic-reports/economic-data/Economic-Data_250725-Housing-update_bulletin_25Jul25.pdf
Property Focus | For homeowners and investors – ANZ, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.anz.co.nz/about-us/economic-markets-research/property-focus/
Deposit Interest Rate in New Zealand – Trading Economics, accessed November 23, 2025, https://tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/deposit-interest-rate
NZ stocks ride wave of 2026 optimism – Good Returns, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.goodreturns.co.nz/article/976525028/nz-stocks-ride-wave-of-2026-optimism.html
Celebrating 10 Years of the S&P/NZX Indices, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/education/education-celebrating-10-years-of-the-sp-nzx-indices.pdf
NZ Herald 15 November 2025 | Mary Holm, accessed November 23, 2025, https://maryholm.com/nz-herald-15-november-2025/
New Zealand’s Top 10 KiwiSaver Funds – Canstar, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.canstar.co.nz/kiwisaver/new-zealands-top-10-kiwisaver-schemes/
NZ sharemarket falls over 1% – Good Returns, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.goodreturns.co.nz/article/976525080/nz-sharemarket-falls-over-1.html
Why invest in a PIE fund? | Baker Tilly Staples Rodway, accessed November 23, 2025, https://bakertillysr.nz/news/yes-you-can-have-your-pie-and-eat-it-too/
Markets, S&p/nzx Indices – NZX, New Zealand’s Exchange, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.nzx.com/markets/indices
Pay Off Debt or Invest? The Smart Money Decision Guide, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.westernsouthern.com/personal-finance/pay-off-debt-or-invest
Who’s really paying for ‘incredibly aggressive’ cash back competition? | RNZ News, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/579648/who-s-really-paying-for-incredibly-aggressive-cash-back-competition
Get mortgage free sooner. – Westpac, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.westpac.co.nz/home-loans-mortgages/manage/pay-off-your-mortgage-faster/
Should You Pay Off Your Mortgage Early or Invest? | Morningstar, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/personal-finance/pay-down-mortgage-or-invest-2024-edition
Pay down debt vs. invest | How to choose | Fidelity, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/pay-down-debt-vs-invest
Kiwisaver fund provider : r/PersonalFinanceNZ – Reddit, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/PersonalFinanceNZ/comments/1mn216l/kiwisaver_fund_provider/

Disclaimer: The information contained on this blog page is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as professional financial advice. I am not a financial adviser. Financial situations are highly individual. Before making any significant investment or mortgage repayment decisions, you should seek advice from a qualified New Zealand financial adviser to discuss your specific goals and circumstances.